Okay, so now that someone has finally been able to conclusively expose the perpetrators responsible for the global warming hoax by releasing their unredacted e-mails, we can all relax, right? The politicians would never try to circumvent all logic and real science by doing something drastic at Copenhagen after the lid has been blown off their scandal, would they? Not so fast. I’ll reiterate what I discovered in the global warming report I did in college a couple of years back.*
The bottom line is that if you think we’re safe now just because the science has been proven fraudulent, keep in mind that global warming never had anything to do with science. This whole circus started in the late 1980s as Communism was fizzling out, and the Marxists soon found that scientific alarmism, however preposterous, could be more effective at enslaving naïve Western democracies than outdated Leninist agitprop. That’s all we need to know. None of the IPCC’s assessment reports is worth the paper it’s printed on, and I’ve got the proof. Check it out if you like.
As for this week’s shindig at Copenhagen, I still anticipate some kind of treaty or agreement to further weaken what is left of American industry, thereby strengthening Obama’s hand and speed-rushing us into the era of One World Government. Remember that every sector of the economy that falters under excessive regulation is going to end up being owned, not ‘bailed out’, I mean totally owned by Obama. In a short while, we will debate the merits of socialism from prison or underground bunkers while all of our nation’s private wealth has already been gobbled up under the guise of “not allowing critical sectors of the economy to fail.” George Bush had already secured the banks and financial houses for his successor, and if Obama plays his cards right a climate change agreement should guarantee his theft of at least two more crucial sectors: energy and transportation.
Lastly, do not put your faith in democracy; the government doesn’t require our approval. Just because the entire informed electorate are against them, that will not stop the political hacks from doing whatever the hell they want at this climate summit. After all, less than 35% of Americans wanted socialized healthcare; will that stop them from ramming it down our throats?
*The full text of that paper is still available in this blogsite’s Technical Supplemental: www.americathefinaldaysts.blogspot.com.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Ok, you baited me into responding to your ridiculous blog. So, here we go.
I would be willing to bet $5,000 that you have not read all of the emails that you are referring to in your blog, and, in fact, I would bet that you have not read ANY of them, or any of the articles written by scientists that show that they do not actually show what FOX news has spun and skewered them to purportedly claim on their silly comedy network.
The significance of this fact is that not only do you have no idea what your talking about, but also that you don't even have any desire or curiosity to know about it, or any intellectual integrity.
Link to good scientific story on the "scandal":
http://news.mongabay.com/2009/1206-hance_email.html
You might think differently if you had read my report. My info was well-researched, the sources are there for all to see, and in 2 years I have not changed a single line....The climate hoaxers could learn something from that.
The fact alone that the e-mails were redacted should raise a red flag. THERE WAS SOMETHING THEY DIDN'T WANT ANYBODY TO SEE and now we know what it was--the truth is out in the open and there's nothing you can do to stuff the genie back in the bottle. And I'm not gonna take any flak over FOX; they're the ONLY major news outlet that reported the story. I'm not going to some unverified George Soros-funded website run by a guy in a tinfoil hat to get my news.
Look, your blogs are silly fantasy to begin with, but after re-reading this one, it borders on incendiary. I just want anyone reading this to know that I am NOT associated with it. It sounds like a rant from the Weather Underground or something.
As for your climate change nonsense, the AP refuted you a few days ago
http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/19403
Come back and start playing with real facts. Then we'll talk.
WHY do you respond to everything with a LINK to some unverified website that no one cares one whit about? Tell us, in your own words, exactly how you know that my research is flawed. I'm not a businessman here; I'm not trying to sell you anything. I think your precious websites have led you astray, and--believe me--they ARE trying to sell you something.
Post a Comment